Diff of Wrong at 021626f
@@ -7,4 +7,5 @@ Due to technical limitations, this page is not currently aware of the particular
* The claim you just made is inconsistent with my reading of an obscure paper I happened to see.
-* Your argument is only by word association and does not make sense.
+* Your argument only works by word association and equivocation.
* You made a minor grammar error and are thus scheduled for obliteration.
+* Your argument relates poorly defined terms in a way which makes no concrete predictions.
* [[gwern]] once offhandedly claimed the opposite.