Diff of Minoteaur at 901bcbb

@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
 Mostly copied from public Minoteaur documentation copied from internal documentation:
+
 The new,  inevitable Minoteaur is here and inescapably/inexorably so. I refer, of course, to Minoteaur 8, ~~which is not actually here at all (this is Minoteaur 6; Minoteaur 7 and 7.1 [DATA EXPUNGED], although aggressive containment measures were able to save the vast majority (>99.3%) of the noosphere from contamination); I am using this because it's actually consistently up and doesn't lose data randomly to my changes~~ which already exists. ~~Not that Minoteaur 8 does this. You should be unconcerned by this and ignore any insinuations that it has or might.~~ It has:

@@ -34,3 +35,4 @@ The new,  inevitable Minoteaur is here and inescapably/inexorably so. I refer, o
 * editing titles
-* per-page themingIt could maybe have:
+* per-page theming
+It could maybe have:
 * more detailed logging/analysis than just "recently viewed" - track most common paths and pages, maybe store all logs ever for future analysis by better tooling (for purposes)

@@ -56,5 +58,7 @@ performance improvements - caching maths, perhaps, or working early exit in list
 }
-* better discovery than the search thing (alphabetized index maybe); reorganize existing stuffHeav wants:
+* better discovery than the search thing (alphabetized index maybe); reorganize existing stuff
+Heav wants:
 * automatic pluralization/singularization on name list
-* "Minoteaur subscribers"Mild aesthetic-ish improvements:
+* "Minoteaur subscribers"
+Mild aesthetic-ish improvements:
 * ~~Work out how to make an actually nice UI - Minoteaur 6 had a sort of proto-two-pane UI for "metadata" and buttons and whatever, Minoteaur 7 just has a search/navigation UI there - how much can I blatantly copy all other programs, and how much are they bad? Maybe I just need more modals or pullout menu bits or something.~~ Three-pane UI design works well enough for now. Might need to work out how to render middle-bar stuff at the side but whatever.

@@ -64,2 +68,5 @@ Investigate `hashbow`-type thing on page names for rainbows™. Maybe use nicer
 * Previous development efforts, involving gradients, look rather bad.
-}Many useful Minoteaur pages (maths notes, primarily) were (are) just bullet-pointed lists. They are quick to write but have some readability and organization problems. Splitting pages as I do now looks nicer, but requires me to make decisions about when to split things up and how. Hypothetical Minoteaur 9 would represent all notes as a very large tree of bullet points (parts could of course be expanded or contracted as needed). There would be no pages. However, it would be possible to assign metadata or something to bullet points. There would be no explicit links, but highlighting phrases would allow you to jump to what the system thinks is the best thing to show you (based on context (LLM or something) and position in document), or possibly just scroll through all other instances.
\ No newline at end of file
+}
+Many useful Minoteaur pages (maths notes, primarily) were (are) just bullet-pointed lists. They are quick to write but have some readability and organization problems. Splitting pages as I do now looks nicer, but requires me to make decisions about when to split things up and how. Hypothetical Minoteaur 9 would represent all notes as a very large tree of bullet points (parts could of course be expanded or contracted as needed). There would be no pages. However, it would be possible to assign metadata or something to bullet points. There would be no explicit links, but highlighting phrases would allow you to jump to what the system thinks is the best thing to show you (based on context (LLM or something) and position in document), or possibly just scroll through all other instances.
+
+Also note:  concept - probably requires more detailed edits.
\ No newline at end of file