Diff of Wrong at 96ff708

@@ -6,3 +6,5 @@ Due to technical limitations, this page is not currently aware of the particular
 * Your statement is an incoherent jumble of vaguely associated technical terms which does not actually parse into a claim.
+* Your reasoning is based on a roughly accurate intuition or approximation which doesn't generalize to the edge case you just used it in.
 * The claim you just made is inconsistent with my reading of an obscure paper I happened to see.
+* Your argument could only be generated by someone with deep and abiding misunderstandings of physics, maths, reality, etc.
 * Your argument only works by word association and equivocation.

@@ -13,2 +15,3 @@ Due to technical limitations, this page is not currently aware of the particular
 * Your answer is right, but only because your mistakes didn't fail to cancel out.
+* Your values are evidently antithetical to my own and you will need to be paperclipped in time.
 * The claim you just made is contradicted by thinking about it for five seconds and basic domain knowledge.

@@ -16,2 +19,4 @@ Due to technical limitations, this page is not currently aware of the particular
 * You are trying to solve the wrong problem using the wrong methods based on a wrong model of the world derived from poor thinking and unfortunately all of your mistakes have failed to cancel out.
-* A brief Fermi estimate shows that your answer is most likely off by several orders of magnitude.
\ No newline at end of file
+* A brief Fermi estimate shows that your answer is most likely off by several orders of magnitude.
+* The evidence for your claim is based on problematic evaluations, standards or methods of measurement and you have not sufficiently justified them.
+* Most arguments are wrong. You made an argument. Therefore, it's probably wrong.
\ No newline at end of file