Diff of Wrong at b49d927

@@ -6,4 +6,6 @@ Due to technical limitations, this page is not currently aware of the particular
 * Your statement is an incoherent jumble of vaguely associated technical terms which does not actually parse into a claim.
+* The claim you just made is inconsistent with my reading of an obscure paper I happened to see.
 * You made a minor grammar error and are thus scheduled for obliteration.
 * [[gwern]] once offhandedly claimed the opposite.
+* The claim you just made is contradicted by thinking about it for five seconds and basic domain knowledge.
 * You uncritically repeated a piece of technical marketing which makes impossible or wildly implausible claims.