Diff of Right at b6104d7
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@+If you are reading this page because you have been linked to it in reference to you, it's likely because [[gollark]] is right. It is likely that you are [[wrong]], but this may not always hold.++Due to technical limitations, this page is not currently aware of the particular way in which gollark is right. However, we anticipate that it is one of the following:++*. gollark made a claim supported by decades of research, regardless of whether or not it feels god.+*. gollark made a coherent, technical argument which clearly and unambiguously forms a true claim.+*. gollark's reasoning is based on a roughly accurate intuition or approximation which generalizes perfectly to the case they just used it in.+*. An obscure paper gollark knows of demonstrates that they're right.+*. gollark's argument could only be generated by someone with deep and practical knowledge of physics, maths, reality, etc.+*. gollark's argument works by standard, valid logical deductions and empirics.+*. If the claim gollark made was true, someone could easily print money, and has.+*. gollark made no grammar or spelling errors.+*. gollark defined their terms well and the resulting argument makes clear, concrete predictions.+*. [[gwern]] once offhandedly agreed with gollark.+*. gollark appears to have made mistakes, but the mistakes cancelled out.+*. gollark's objectively correct values are correct and yours are not.+*. gollark made a claim easily demonstrated using thinking about it for five seconds and basic domain knowledge.+*. gollark repeated a piece of technical marketing which was shown to be basically correct.+*. gollark is trying to solve the right problem using the right methods based on a right model of the world derived from good thinking and it worked.+*. A brief Fermi estimate shows that gollark's claim is most likely correct.+*. The evidence for gollark's claim is based on evaluations, standards or methods of measurement which are appropriate and justified in this case.+*. Most gollark arguments are right. gollark made an argument. Therefore, it's probably right.\ No newline at end of file